Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Peugeot 607 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 317 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300M is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300M engine produces 118 HP more power than Peugeot 607, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Peugeot 607. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 6.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 607 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300M consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 607, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300M could require 600 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 607 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler 300M is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler 300M is 13 cm longer than the Peugeot 607, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300M is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300M has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300M has 49 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 607. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300M is 0.1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 607. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`115 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
Peugeot 607 has
| |