Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300M is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300M engine produces 40 HP more power than Mazda Xedos 9, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Mazda Xedos 9. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.0 | |
|
The Mazda Xedos 9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300M consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300M could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Xedos 9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Chrysler 300M is larger. Chrysler 300M is 18 cm longer than the Mazda Xedos 9, 15 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300M is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300M has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300M has 100 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |