Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Lexus ES 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 213 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300M engine produces 41 HP more power than Lexus ES, whereas torque is 42 NM more than Lexus ES. Despite the higher power, Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.2 | |
|
The Lexus ES is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300M consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus ES, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300M could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Lexus ES gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler 300M is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler 300M is 17 cm longer than the Lexus ES, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300M is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300M has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300M has 120 litres more trunk space than the Lexus ES. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
Lexus ES has
| |