Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Jaguar S-Type 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300M engine produces 14 HP more power than Jaguar S-Type, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Jaguar S-Type. Despite the higher power, Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 11.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler 300M consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar S-Type, which means that by driving the Chrysler 300M over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler 300M consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar S-Type. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar S-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300M) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar S-Type) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chrysler 300M is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler 300M is 14 cm longer than the Jaguar S-Type, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300M is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | 810 litres | |
| Chrysler 300M has 160 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar S-Type. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar S-Type (by 280 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300M is 0.6 metres less than that of the Jaguar S-Type, which means Chrysler 300M can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
Jaguar S-Type has
| |