Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Honda Legend 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 297 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300M is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300M engine produces 49 HP more power than Honda Legend, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Honda Legend. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 12.2 | |
|
The Chrysler 300M is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300M consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Legend, which means that by driving the Chrysler 300M over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler 300M gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Chrysler 300M and Honda Legend are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300M is 0.5 metres more than that of the Honda Legend, which means Chrysler 300M can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
| |