Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Dodge Intrepid 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 228 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300M engine produces 26 HP more power than Dodge Intrepid, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Dodge Intrepid. Despite the higher power, Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.7 | |
|
The Dodge Intrepid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300M consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Intrepid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300M could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Intrepid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chrysler 300M is 18 cm shorter than the Dodge Intrepid, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
530 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`120 kg | 2`070 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
Dodge Intrepid has
| |