Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Dodge Intrepid 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 254 HP | 203 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 258 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Chrysler 300M is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300M engine produces 51 HP more power than Dodge Intrepid, whereas torque is 82 NM more than Dodge Intrepid. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.1 | |
The Dodge Intrepid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300M consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Intrepid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300M could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Dodge Intrepid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.00 m | 5.18 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Chrysler 300M is 18 cm shorter than the Dodge Intrepid, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 520 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler 300M has 10 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Intrepid. The Dodge Intrepid may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`070 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
Dodge Intrepid has
| |