Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Chrysler Sebring 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300M is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300M engine produces 51 HP more power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 78 NM more than Chrysler Sebring. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.2 | |
| Chrysler 300M consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300M could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Chrysler 300M is larger. Chrysler 300M is 16 cm longer than the Chrysler Sebring, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300M is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300M has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300M has 75 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300M is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |