Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Chrysler LHS 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 254 HP | 257 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 348 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300M engine produces 3 HP less power than Chrysler LHS, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Chrysler LHS. Despite less power, Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.9 | |
| Chrysler 300M consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler LHS, which means that by driving the Chrysler 300M over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chrysler 300M is 28 cm shorter than the Chrysler LHS, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
530 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`120 kg | 2`100 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler LHS has
| |