Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Volvo S80 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 300M engine produces 69 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 124 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler 300M consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Chrysler 300M over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler 300M consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Chrysler 300M is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler 300M is 18 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300M is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | 1106 litres | |
| Chrysler 300M has 90 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S80 (by 576 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300M is 1.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Chrysler 300M can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.6/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |