Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Chrysler Concorde 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 NM | 258 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300M and Chrysler Concorde have the same engine power, but Chrysler 300M torque is 2 NM less than Chrysler Concorde. Chrysler 300M reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 10.1 | |
| Chrysler 300M consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Concorde, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300M could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Chrysler 300M is 28 cm shorter than the Chrysler Concorde, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Concorde has
| |