Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Chrysler 300C 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler 300M is available only with front wheel drive, while Chrysler 300C can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol) | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 - 254 HP | 193 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 - 340 NM | 257 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 10 seconds | 5 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 - 10.7 | 8.3 - 14.0 | |
|
Chrysler 300M petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300C. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.53 m | |
| Chrysler 300M is 1 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300M is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 630 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | 1602 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space. Chrysler 300M has 100 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler 300C (by 1072 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300M is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C, which means Chrysler 300M can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`120 | ~ 2`334 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.6/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |