Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Chrysler 300C 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Chrysler 300M
1998 - 2004
Chrysler 300C
2004 - 2011
Body: SedanEstate car / wagon
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Chrysler 300M is available only with front wheel drive, while Chrysler 300C can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol)2.7 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 203 - 254 HP193 - 425 HP
Torque: 256 - 340 NM257 - 570 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 - 10 seconds5 - 11 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.5 - 10.78.3 - 14.0
Chrysler 300M petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300C.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 5.00 m5.01 m
Width: 1.92 m1.88 m
Height: 1.42 m1.53 m
Chrysler 300M is 1 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300M is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 530 litres630 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
530 litres1602 litres
Chrysler 300C has more luggage space.
Chrysler 300M has 100 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler 300C (by 1072 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler 300M is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chrysler 300C, which means Chrysler 300M can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`120~ 2`334
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 14004600
Rating in user reviews: 9.6/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Chrysler 300M has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Chrysler 300C has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv