Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Dodge Intrepid 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 - 254 HP | 163 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 - 340 NM | 245 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 10 seconds | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 - 10.7 | 9.1 - 10.6 | |
|
Chrysler 300M petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Intrepid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Chrysler 300M is 16 cm shorter than the Dodge Intrepid, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler 300M has 10 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Intrepid. The Dodge Intrepid may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`120 | ~ 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Intrepid has
| |