Chrysler 300M 1998 vs Chrysler Sebring 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler 300M is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Chrysler Sebring has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 | 2.0 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 - 254 HP | 141 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 256 - 340 NM | 188 - 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 10 seconds | 9.5 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 - 10.7 | 8.5 - 10.4 | |
|
Chrysler 300M petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Sebring. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Chrysler 300M is larger. Chrysler 300M is 16 cm longer than the Chrysler Sebring, 13 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300M is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
530 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300M has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300M has 75 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300M is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`120 | ~ 1`943 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300M has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |