Chrysler 200 2015 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 294 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 355 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler 200 engine produces 6 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, but torque is 5 NM more than Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 200 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chrysler 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Chrysler 200 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Chrysler 200 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Chrysler 200 2015 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Chrysler 200 2015 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chrysler 200 is larger. Chrysler 200 is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat CC, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chrysler 200 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`092 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`650 kg | 1`629 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 442 kg | 501 kg | |
| Chrysler 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Volkswagen Passat CC. Therefore, Volkswagen Passat CC is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |