Chrysler 200 2015 vs Chevrolet Impala 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 294 HP | 309 HP | |
Torque: | 355 NM | 358 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Chrysler 200 engine produces 15 HP less power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.7 | |
Chrysler 200 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that by driving the Chrysler 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
780 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Chevrolet Impala gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler 200 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Used also on Chevrolet Camaro, Chevrolet Equinox | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Chrysler 200 2015 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Chrysler 200 2015 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.89 m | 5.11 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.50 m | |
Chrysler 200 is 23 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 532 litres | |
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 79 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`092 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |