Chrysler 200 2010 vs Volvo S80 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler 200) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo S80) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 200 is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 200 engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo S80, but torque is 175 NM less than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Chrysler 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 6.0 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 200 consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 630 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 200 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Volvo S80 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler 200 has 95 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. This could mean that the Chrysler 200 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Chrysler 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`143 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |