Chrysler 200 2010 vs Mazda 6 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 256 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 200 engine produces 19 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 6.3 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 200 consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda 6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 200 and Mazda 6 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 489 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 104 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`143 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |