Chrysler 200 2010 vs Honda Accord 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 228 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Chrysler 200 engine produces 7 HP less power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Honda Accord. Despite less power, Chrysler 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.2 | |
|
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 200 consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 200 and Honda Accord are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 447 litres | |
|
Honda Accord has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 62 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Chrysler 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`143 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Honda Accord has
| |