Chrysler 200 2010 vs Ford Mondeo 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 200 engine produces 13 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, but torque is 15 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Despite the higher power, Chrysler 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 6.3 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 200 consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 200 and Ford Mondeo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 429 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 44 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Chrysler 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`143 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |