Chrysler 200 2010 vs Ford Mondeo 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 200 is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 200 engine produces 28 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Chrysler 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 7.9 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 200 consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 500'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Mondeo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring, Jeep Compass | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Galaxy, Ford S-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Chrysler 200 is 3 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 554 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chrysler 200 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`143 kg | 2`090 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |