Chrysler 200 2010 vs Skoda Superb 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler 200) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Superb) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 200 is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 200 engine produces 33 HP more power than Skoda Superb, but torque is 95 NM less than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Chrysler 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 5.9 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 200 consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 645 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 200 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 385 litres | 565 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1700 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chrysler 200 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`143 kg | 2`117 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |