Chrysler 200 2014 vs Volvo V40 2016
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 200 is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 200 engine produces 65 HP more power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 14 NM more than Volvo V40. Thanks to more power Chrysler 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 5.4 | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 200 consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chrysler 200 is larger. Chrysler 200 is 52 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Chrysler 200 has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 200 has 118 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`092 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |