Chrysler 200 2014 vs Mazda 6 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
| Chrysler 200 engine produces 37 HP more power than Mazda 6, but torque is 146 NM less than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Chrysler 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 3.9 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 200 consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 690 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1580 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1820 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Renegade | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chrysler 200 is larger. Chrysler 200 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 489 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler 200 has 36 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. This could mean that the Chrysler 200 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 1.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`092 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |