Chrysler 200 2014 vs Mazda 6 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 200 is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 200 engine produces 37 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Chrysler 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.1 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 200 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Renegade | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda 6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chrysler 200 is larger. Chrysler 200 is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 438 litres | |
| Chrysler 200 has 15 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`092 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |