Chrysler 200 2014 vs BMW 5 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chrysler 200) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW 5 series) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 5.8 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 200 engine produces 71 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 326 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 5.1 | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 200 consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 510 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 5 series engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Renegade | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW 5 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW 5 sērija 2013 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2013 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 200 is 2 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 520 litres | |
|
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 67 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.1 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`092 | 2`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |