Chrysler 200 2014 vs Kia Optima 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 187 HP | 188 HP | |
Torque: | 234 NM | 241 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
Chrysler 200 engine produces 1 HP less power than Kia Optima, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Kia Optima. Despite less power, Chrysler 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.3 | |
Chrysler 200 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Optima, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 200 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
Kia Optima gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.89 m | 4.86 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 200 is 3 cm longer than the Kia Optima, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 453 litres | 510 litres | |
Kia Optima has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler 200 has 57 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. This could mean that the Chrysler 200 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Kia Optima, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`092 | 2`050 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 10 200 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Kia Optima has
| |