Chrysler 200 2010 vs Mazda 6 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler 200 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda 6 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 - 287 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 - 353 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9.3 seconds | 7.8 - 10.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 10.2 | 3.9 - 6.3 | |
|
Chrysler 200 petrol engines consumes on average 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 200 and Mazda 6 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 489 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 99 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`115 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |