Chrysler 200 2010 vs Lexus IS 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Chrysler 200 is available with front wheel drive, while Lexus IS can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 | 2.5 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 173 - 287 HP | 208 - 423 HP | |
Torque: | 225 - 353 NM | 252 - 505 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9.3 seconds | 4.8 - 8.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 10.2 | 9.1 - 11.4 | |
Chrysler 200 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Lexus IS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
Chrysler 200 is larger. Chrysler 200 is 25 cm longer than the Lexus IS, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 378 litres | |
Chrysler 200 has 12 litres more trunk space than the Lexus IS. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 1 metres more than that of the Lexus IS, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`115 | ~ 2`120 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 7000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Lexus IS has
| |