Chrysler 200 2010 vs Chevrolet Impala 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 | 3.5 - 5.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 - 287 HP | 214 - 307 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 - 353 NM | 290 - 438 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9.3 seconds | 6.5 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 10.2 | 9.0 - 10.2 | |
|
Chrysler 200 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Impala. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Chrysler 200 is smaller. Chrysler 200 is 22 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 527 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 137 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`115 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |