Chrysler 200 2014 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Chrysler 200 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo V40 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler 200 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo V40 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 - 300 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 - 355 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.2 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
Chrysler 200 petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chrysler 200 is larger. Chrysler 200 is 52 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Chrysler 200 has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 200 has 128 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`141 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |