Chrysler 200 2014 vs Nissan Almera 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler 200 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Nissan Almera has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Chrysler 200 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Almera can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 | 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 - 300 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 - 355 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9 seconds | 10.9 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.2 | 7.2 - 8.5 | |
|
Chrysler 200 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Almera can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Chrysler 200 is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler 200 is 23 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 18 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler 200 has 37 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. This could mean that the Chrysler 200 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`141 | ~ 1`625 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |