Chrysler 200 2014 vs Jaguar XF 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler 200 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar XF can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chrysler 200 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Jaguar XF is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 - 300 HP | 180 - 380 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 - 355 NM | 340 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9 seconds | 5.3 - 8.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.2 | 4.3 - 8.6 | |
|
Chrysler 200 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XF. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | 116 mm (4.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Chrysler 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler 200 is smaller, but slightly higher. Chrysler 200 is 7 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 885 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 77 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`141 kg | ~ 2`321 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`650 kg | ~ 1`723 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 491 kg | ~ 598 kg | |
| Chrysler 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Jaguar XF. Therefore, Jaguar XF is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |