Chrysler 200 2014 vs Jaguar XF 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler 200 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar XF can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chrysler 200 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Jaguar XF is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 - 300 HP | 180 - 380 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 - 355 NM | 340 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9 seconds | 5.3 - 8.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.2 | 4.3 - 8.6 | |
|
Chrysler 200 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XF. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler 200 is smaller, but slightly higher. Chrysler 200 is 7 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler 200 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 540 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Chrysler 200 has 77 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`141 | ~ 2`302 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |