Chrysler 200 2014 vs Hyundai Equus 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler 200 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Hyundai Equus can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.6 | 3.8 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 - 300 HP | 334 - 430 HP | |
| Torque: | 234 - 355 NM | 395 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 9 seconds | 5.8 - 6.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.2 | 10.9 - 12.3 | |
|
Chrysler 200 petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Equus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Chrysler 200 is smaller. Chrysler 200 is 28 cm shorter than the Hyundai Equus, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 463 litres | 474 litres | |
| Chrysler 200 has 11 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Equus. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 200 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Hyundai Equus, which means Chrysler 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`141 | ~ 2`465 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 200 has
|
| |