Chevrolet Trax 2022 vs BMW X3 2025
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 139 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 219 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Trax engine produces 51 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 91 NM less than BMW X3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.2 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Trax) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW X3) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW X3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of BMW X3 2025 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is smaller. Chevrolet Trax is 22 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 725 litres | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1532 litres | 1700 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X3 (by 168 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`425 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 44 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
BMW X3 has
| |