Chevrolet Trax 2017 vs Suzuki SX4 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Trax and Suzuki SX4 have the same engine power, but Chevrolet Trax torque is 20 NM less than Suzuki SX4. Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 5.7 | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Trax consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Trax could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 157 mm (6.2 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki SX4 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2016 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki SX4 2016 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Trax is 4 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1371 litres | 1269 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Trax has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Suzuki SX4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Trax (by 102 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4, which means Chevrolet Trax can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`730 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |