Chevrolet Trax 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Trax engine produces 23 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Trax consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Trax could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 157 mm (6.2 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Mitsubishi ASX 2017 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Trax is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1371 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Trax has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Trax (by 152 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`870 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |