Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2012

 
Chevrolet Trax
2013 - 2017
Opel Mokka
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Diesel1.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP130 HP
Torque: 300 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 seconds9.4 seconds
Chevrolet Trax and Opel Mokka have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.1
Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway1220 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.28 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.67 m1.66 m
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Trax is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 356 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1372 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.1 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka.
Gross weight: 1`933 kg1`959 kg
Net weight:1`429 kg1`490 kg
Load capacity:504 kg469 kg
Safety:
Opel Mokka is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 64007000
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Trax has
  • lower price
Opel Mokka has
  • higher children safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv