Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012

 
Chevrolet Trax
2013 - 2017
Mitsubishi ASX
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP150 HP
Torque: 300 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 secondsn/a seconds
Chevrolet Trax engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.95.7
The Chevrolet Trax is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1060 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway1200 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.30 m
Width: 1.78 m1.77 m
Height: 1.67 m1.63 m
Chevrolet Trax is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 356 litres384 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1219 litres
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space.
Chevrolet Trax has 28 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX.
Gross weight: 1`933 kg2`060 kg
Net weight:1`429 kg1`525 kg
Load capacity:504 kg535 kg
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 640010 600
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Trax has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Mitsubishi ASX has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv