Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Trax engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.2 | |
|
The Chevrolet Trax is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is smaller. Chevrolet Trax is 31 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Trax has 147 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Chevrolet Trax can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`933 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`429 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 504 kg | 630 kg | |
| Chevrolet Trax load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem less than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Mazda CX-5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |