Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Ford EcoSport 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Trax engine produces 35 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.4 | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Trax could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Trax is 3 cm shorter than the Ford EcoSport, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1238 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Trax has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Ford EcoSport may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`933 kg | 1`760 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`429 kg | 1`372 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 504 kg | 388 kg | |
| Chevrolet Trax load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Ford EcoSport. Therefore, Chevrolet Trax is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests, but Ford EcoSport is better rated in child safety tests. The Chevrolet Trax scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |