Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Trax and Opel Mokka have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
| By specification Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Trax is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1372 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.1 metres more than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`888 | 1`959 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Opel Mokka has
| |