Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012

 
Chevrolet Trax
2013 -
Mitsubishi ASX
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.7 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP150 HP
Torque: 300 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 secondsn/a seconds
Chevrolet Trax engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.35.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.6 l/100km
By specification Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
1130 km on highway1200 km on highway
750 km with real consumption900 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.30 m
Width: 1.78 m1.77 m
Height: 1.67 m1.63 m
Chevrolet Trax is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 356 litres384 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1219 litres
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space.
Chevrolet Trax has 28 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8882`060
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 840011 400
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Trax has
  • lower price
Mitsubishi ASX has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv