Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Trax engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Trax could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is smaller. Chevrolet Trax is 31 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Trax has 147 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Chevrolet Trax can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`888 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |