Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Trax engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Trax could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is smaller. Chevrolet Trax is 31 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Trax has 147 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Chevrolet Trax can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`888 kg | 2`050 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`387 kg | 1`430 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 501 kg | 620 kg | |
| Chevrolet Trax load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Mazda CX-5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |