Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Ford EcoSport 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Trax engine produces 35 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Trax could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Trax is 3 cm shorter than the Ford EcoSport, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1238 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Trax has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Trax has 23 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The Ford EcoSport may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`888 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests, but Ford EcoSport is better rated in child safety tests. The Chevrolet Trax scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |