Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2011

 
Chevrolet Trax
2013 -
Chevrolet Captiva
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.7 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 130 HP184 HP
Torque: 300 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds10.1 seconds
Chevrolet Captiva is a more dynamic driving.
Chevrolet Trax engine produces 54 HP less power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Chevrolet Captiva. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.37.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km10.5 l/100km
The Chevrolet Trax is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chevrolet Trax consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Trax consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
1130 km on highway1010 km on highway
750 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption
Chevrolet Trax gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.67 m
Width: 1.78 m1.85 m
Height: 1.67 m1.73 m
Chevrolet Trax is smaller.
Chevrolet Trax is 42 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 356 litres477 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1577 litres
Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space.
Chevrolet Trax has 121 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Captiva.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.9 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Chevrolet Trax can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8882`505
Safety:
Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests. The Chevrolet Trax scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 82006600
Pros and Cons: Chevrolet Trax has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Chevrolet Captiva has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv