Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Chevrolet Trax and Opel Mokka have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
The Opel Mokka is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
1300 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
860 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.25 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Trax is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 356 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1372 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`888 | 1`959 | |
Safety: | |||
Opel Mokka is better rated in child safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 8200 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Opel Mokka has
| |