Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Trax and Nissan Qashqai have the same engine power, but Chevrolet Trax torque is 20 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1440 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1660 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Trax is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 388 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Chevrolet Trax has 32 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`888 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |