Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Trax and Nissan Qashqai have the same engine power, but Chevrolet Trax torque is 1 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.6 | |
| Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Trax over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Trax is 8 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Chevrolet Trax has 54 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`791 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |