Chevrolet Trax 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Trax engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 1 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Trax reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Trax consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Trax could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet Cruze | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Trax might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
| Chevrolet Trax is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Trax is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Chevrolet Trax has 86 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Trax is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`791 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Trax has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |